It is comfortable to look at the product alone for the design language and the overall feeling. Xiaomi still has a large reference site. A good designer should learn to absorb other people's strengths and transform them into his own connotation. Come on
Your work is always in the shadow of other people's products, just like the paper shredder in your work, the modeling language is exactly the same as the coffee machine that makes oxygen design. It is not easy to say much. You should have your own opinions in designing.
This is why designers should be able to speak, otherwise Party A will not understand your thoughts at all. Let's just think of yourself as Party A for exercise ()
I think the biggest idea of this work is to use the house to make a nightlight. If there is light in the house, there will be warmth and warmth.
The lights at home are warm, the lights at home are bright, and the smiling faces at home are happy. On this night, may you have a happy good mood, good dreams, good things!
Yes, if the function of the wood house is made into a space that can accommodate some books, it will feel more suitable, because if the book fair is opened on the roof for a long time, the books will bend and there is also the risk of opening glue. If it is temporarily placed, it is also OK. The second is the shelf, which provides an improvement suggestion. Turn the orientation of the shelf to the reader's side, and you can just put a book on it, so reading for a long time will not be very laborious, and the function of the shelf will be brought into full play.
Plagiarism is not considered, but there are too many overlapping elements with this model, which is inevitably controversial. https://www.puxiang.com/galleries/7e3f02d21c3fd179f8cb73f481200f1a?favorite=true
Try to avoid this kind of behavior criticism that is too similar to someone's situation. It is a bit similar to others' forgiveness. Does it mean you didn't make any mistakes... cause unnecessary controversy
Judging by the first reaction of most people, if most people think you are very similar, then there is suspicion. For works that I would rather not be suspected, it feels like a waste of life for me to walk again on the road that others have taken.
If others forgive me, does it mean that I didn't make a mistake? In fact, you have already put me in the list of plagiarism, especially because I am just a plagiarist who "passes gas with the original author.
I personally feel that I am ready to copy what he means. Maybe I have not received any education because of my self-study in design. I don't quite understand where your specific definition boundary of reference and plagiarism is. There is no so-called intention map in my own design. Only what looks good in my mind and what I want him to be.
As for the definition of plagiarism and reference, my own definition is whether your product is what you think in your heart, and whether you go according to your own thoughts or other people's products. One situation is the deduction of conception to result, and the other situation is the supplement of conception and process. The latter is plagiarism in my mind. However, the definition of plagiarism in practical invention patents is the principle of characteristic comparison that extends A B C. The former individual principle the latter legal definition.
The author of the pencil sharpener in the cabin added that he did not mind... What does the subconscious word mean. If removed is more sure of the value of your work.
If you can't see the comments and can't communicate with the author, just look at the work. How many people will suspect that the work is a reference or plagiarism. Maybe it depends on people. I don't like criticized designs, just like the first person to apply for a patent.
Let's have a look and discuss the definition of plagiarism. In fact, I also want to know how product design defines plagiarism, because if the starting point and process are different and a similar result is obtained, how is it judged.
First of all, the most important concept of the suspected core in the design is the problem of bookmarks and switches. Other nonsense is fine. Besides, the 20-year-old design concept is still in use today. Is there a problem if you doubt it?
This idea of yours is true. I saw my professor's works more than ten years ago about 2012. His works before 2004 were patented! You just have an extra shelf! Judging from everyone's reaction to your shelf, your shelf is suspected of evading patents!
Where I have a mind map above, where I have my thinking process and the starting point of design. When I was doing this work, I took part in a cultural and creative competition. I could give a complete process from the beginning of the topic to the result. As for the shelf, in fact, the initial design was not a simple shelf, which I also mentioned in the following "Fan" reply. Another point is why I made this shelf because I felt that a room was a little thin to express the Zen temple, so I added the pillars and roof of the Zen temple to make the expression more direct. This is a competition after all I'm afraid the expression is too cryptic.
Also, thanks to the question, I can also reopen an article to put up the whole process of doing this competition and the timeline including the source files.
I just saw that the core design concept of someone is the same as that of my professor 20 years ago. It is far-fetched to add one thing, so I can't say two words. What am I jealous of? What is there to be jealous of? I don't design lamps and lanterns! You little man making pie!
It is comfortable to look at the product alone for the design language and the overall feeling. Xiaomi still has a large reference site. A good designer should learn to absorb other people's strengths and transform them into his own connotation. Come on
Isn't this hut on the list? Why is there no sign?
The idea is great, the idea can be further dug, modeling more try
This product home page for more than a week in a row
Great
Your work is always in the shadow of other people's products, just like the paper shredder in your work, the modeling language is exactly the same as the coffee machine that makes oxygen design. It is not easy to say much. You should have your own opinions in designing.
Can only say to change the shape
It would be much better to change the window symbol.
Comment area: small defense scene
I think the biggest idea of this work is to use the house to make a nightlight. If there is light in the house, there will be warmth and warmth.
The lights at home are warm, the lights at home are bright, and the smiling faces at home are happy. On this night, may you have a happy good mood, good dreams, good things!
Yes, if the function of the wood house is made into a space that can accommodate some books, it will feel more suitable, because if the book fair is opened on the roof for a long time, the books will bend and there is also the risk of opening glue. If it is temporarily placed, it is also OK. The second is the shelf, which provides an improvement suggestion. Turn the orientation of the shelf to the reader's side, and you can just put a book on it, so reading for a long time will not be very laborious, and the function of the shelf will be brought into full play.
Plagiarism is not considered, but there are too many overlapping elements with this model, which is inevitably controversial. https://www.puxiang.com/galleries/7e3f02d21c3fd179f8cb73f481200f1a?favorite=true
The mobile phone shelf is changed to a wireless charging, which is even more refreshing.
Then I'll put the picture. I'm just saying suspicious, I don't care if you think it's appropriate!
This idea of yours is true. I saw my professor's works more than ten years ago about 2012. His works before 2004 were patented! You just have an extra shelf! Judging from everyone's reaction to your shelf, your shelf is suspected of evading patents!