The cost of low-end products is also very low. You can't blindly pursue the appearance effect. No matter how good the design is, it is worthless. For enterprises, the beauty or ugliness of products, good and bad workmanship are acceptable. What enterprises care about is whether the products can make money. We must also have business awareness when designing.
You misunderstood me. Originally, I wanted to say that the company chose a cheaper process in order to reduce costs. As a result, your words made me think of another question. Why don't designers consider the inconsistency between the future low cost and the original plan when designing? Since it is a low-cost product, it needs to use low-cost materials, and try to improve the product image through design methods. It's not the same when you actually make something good with a rendering picture. This is not a matter of commercial awareness, it is that there is no commercial awareness at all. A good designer wants the company to design products that exceed expectations at a price that the company can accept. It is not that the rendering is different from the real one. It is said that the company wants more than you give in order to make money.
Don't want to be a teacher at every turn, otherwise there are many loopholes. What companies care about is that the products are good, the cost is low, and they can make more money. It is not that the products are beautiful or ugly, and the craftsmanship is good or bad. It is because they have no way to accept it, because there is no better plan!
The actual effect destroyed everything ah ~ ~