Imagine designing a set of pet supplies with the theme of home, and contestant number 1 was born from the pet feeder.
I hope that player 2 will join the water dispenser, player 3 will shovel excrement officer, player 4, player 5, player 6, player 7...
It's a pity that half of the dream was awakened by a basin of water from the customer ~
新用户?创建账号
登录 重置密码
请输入电子邮件以重置密码。
Speculation may be that the cost is high, the innovation of simple appearance is not enough to support the value of the product, and there is a similar way of dividing parts, which is not conducive to the sealing treatment of the inner barrel. Do you want to handle it badly and be criticized by users? Do you want to handle it well, but it increases the cost. However, from the perspective of appearance, it is a very level design.
Generally, there are two common reasons for being passed. One is that you think it looks good and he doesn't think it looks good. The other is that the production cost is high. It can only be said that industrial design is still not acclimatized here. "The soil is not fertile enough, and only fertilization can produce good fruit."
Nice and interesting! It can only be said that this customer did not have the life to earn this money.
I also drew the feeder of this sketch, but the final sketch stage was passed
Bright at the moment
very good
The plan is very interesting, why is it awakened by a basin of water from the customer?
Small houses are fun.
This color is very good
It's fun.