Let more people have their first remote stand-in robot

留言板（15）

偶像 2025-11-10

learning to learn

走进新时代 2025-11-10

Like support.

热河 2025-11-10

Really talented

游尼可屿 2025-11-07

Why doesn't this kind of camera choose the design that is similar to the tank, which can rotate 360 and adjust the pitch at the same time, and adopt this kind of design that seems not very flexible? What are the advantages of this kind?

183****4119 2025-11-07

Possible cost? Could also bring more structural stacking?

游尼可屿 2025-11-07

It should be more difficult structurally, but I seem to have realized another point. If it is remote control, it should be the first viewing angle simulation in the video. It should be the same as driving. If the rotatable angle is too large, it is equivalent to looking at the side and the back when driving, and the control of the moving direction of the car will be lost to a certain extent.

RZXON 2025-11-11

Maybe for structural strength? The gimbal is fragile.

Destin； 2025-11-25

This is not simple, it is not good to design a one-button return

Destin； 2025-11-25

In terms of structure, the UAV's camera is also quite mini, and there are surveillance cameras. Technology and cost are not problems.

Destin； 2025-11-25

Therefore, I suspect that it should be for the sake of simplicity in appearance or limitation in volume, because if it is made into a spherical shape, all the above problems can be solved.

我也说一句