At first glance, the appearance is very handsome. After opening, the lining design is insufficient and a little crude. Disappointed . Although the use experience is 100 pieces, the sound is very ordinary, the opening spring force is too large, and the magnetic positioning of the earphone is not very blind.
1. No one has done it, a new way to play.
2. Use zinc alloy shell to increase texture at low cost
3. Stream organic modeling, g3 continuous surface
4. The feeling of EDC is very interesting to play in your hand.
5.TWS active noise reduction APP tuning intelligent positioning loss prevention
6. A total of 50000 units have been sold.
Pick one by one:
1. Hollow-out play Other products are many. Cross-category reference is not called innovation. Restraint and rational hollow-out is represented by Thundersnake mouse, and organic complex curved surface is represented by highway car helmet. Looking for you, I directly use the Porsche car cover to make it is also innovative, also called no one has done it;
2 and 3 answered together, zinc alloy die-casting is destined to be electroplating at most, or spraying. Most of the hollowing-out modeling logic is cutting. Some small five-sided surfaces built in local details are not even features. Don't be unconvinced. Self-proof is the easiest to lose points to yourself.
56 Basically, it depends on the ability of channel promotion. Simply speaking, it is the ability of the boss to sell goods. What does it have to do with your design? In this market, every copy can sell 100k a year. What are you proud?
It is the fourth point you said that you have touched a little bit, but you can only say that you still learn from this category, so where is the innovation?
You said it was like a sale, but you still didn't tell me where the innovation was? You made something that was a little different. The differentiation was just a little different from the same products in the market, but there was no innovation, right? The elements were all existing things? If you sell well, you will sell well. That's because the boss has made money. Don't brag about yourself. Most of the six-dimensional pictures that IF won the prize were very low in innovation and only passed the comprehensive score.
Tut tut, aggressive, very good
First of all, thank you for your approval , at least our plan has been differentiated. It is possible that the innovation you understand has to be at the level of Dajiang and Macintosh. The innovation I understand is to create differentiated products for new needs.
Secondly, the product details and curved surfaces will not talk to you. It is too boring. Just look at the pictures. Just a reminder, die-cast zinc alloy can be oxidized
Secondly, Dmooster is a brand, you don't understand it wrong, not a design team. So you said I was like a sale, that's right. What do you think the boss has to do with me? I am the boss... I'm also interested in talking to you.
From what you said, I guess you are not the boss of a design company, nor the boss of a brand, let alone a big boss. I can only say that I was as crazy as you, crazy is quite good, but pay attention to basic etiquette. Slamming and ridicule do not bring about substantial promotion.
Our Dmooster is also learning and growing slowly under the restrictions of all aspects of the market's landing capital channels, that is to say, this plan is not so good over
After all, it is an industrial design platform, and the point we are discussing is "innovation", so of course I have to question it.
You said yourself, the inner lining is a male model, what you do is a shell. Whether from the use of design language or CMF design, innovation is actually questionable.
As for your saying that this product sells well, it is indeed not within the scope of discussion. Most of the things that sell well in this market have little to do with design.
I have also done award-winning but poorly sold products, and I have also done half an hour to map out things that ship 300k a year.
So innovation is not differentiation in my opinion. Innovation is risky in the market of this era, and differentiation is often insurance.
has always been optimistic about this brand. come on
At first glance, the appearance is very handsome. After opening, the lining design is insufficient and a little crude. Disappointed . Although the use experience is 100 pieces, the sound is very ordinary, the opening spring force is too large, and the magnetic positioning of the earphone is not very blind.
Is this a re-issue? I remember seeing this one before, and I was quite impressed
Lost the dust-proof and waterproof function of the earphone compartment
nice
On Link
Rich imagination
It's great.
detached from tradition, very innovative,
2. Use zinc alloy shell to increase texture at low cost
3. Stream organic modeling, g3 continuous surface
4. The feeling of EDC is very interesting to play in your hand.
5.TWS active noise reduction APP tuning intelligent positioning loss prevention
6. A total of 50000 units have been sold.
Is that enough? Not enough. I'll go on.
1. Hollow-out play Other products are many. Cross-category reference is not called innovation. Restraint and rational hollow-out is represented by Thundersnake mouse, and organic complex curved surface is represented by highway car helmet. Looking for you, I directly use the Porsche car cover to make it is also innovative, also called no one has done it;
2 and 3 answered together, zinc alloy die-casting is destined to be electroplating at most, or spraying. Most of the hollowing-out modeling logic is cutting. Some small five-sided surfaces built in local details are not even features. Don't be unconvinced. Self-proof is the easiest to lose points to yourself.
56 Basically, it depends on the ability of channel promotion. Simply speaking, it is the ability of the boss to sell goods. What does it have to do with your design? In this market, every copy can sell 100k a year. What are you proud?
It is the fourth point you said that you have touched a little bit, but you can only say that you still learn from this category, so where is the innovation?
You said it was like a sale, but you still didn't tell me where the innovation was? You made something that was a little different. The differentiation was just a little different from the same products in the market, but there was no innovation, right? The elements were all existing things? If you sell well, you will sell well. That's because the boss has made money. Don't brag about yourself. Most of the six-dimensional pictures that IF won the prize were very low in innovation and only passed the comprehensive score.
First of all, thank you for your approval , at least our plan has been differentiated. It is possible that the innovation you understand has to be at the level of Dajiang and Macintosh. The innovation I understand is to create differentiated products for new needs.
Secondly, the product details and curved surfaces will not talk to you. It is too boring. Just look at the pictures. Just a reminder, die-cast zinc alloy can be oxidized
Secondly, Dmooster is a brand, you don't understand it wrong, not a design team. So you said I was like a sale, that's right. What do you think the boss has to do with me? I am the boss... I'm also interested in talking to you.
From what you said, I guess you are not the boss of a design company, nor the boss of a brand, let alone a big boss. I can only say that I was as crazy as you, crazy is quite good, but pay attention to basic etiquette. Slamming and ridicule do not bring about substantial promotion.
Our Dmooster is also learning and growing slowly under the restrictions of all aspects of the market's landing capital channels, that is to say, this plan is not so good over
You said yourself, the inner lining is a male model, what you do is a shell. Whether from the use of design language or CMF design, innovation is actually questionable.
As for your saying that this product sells well, it is indeed not within the scope of discussion. Most of the things that sell well in this market have little to do with design.
I have also done award-winning but poorly sold products, and I have also done half an hour to map out things that ship 300k a year.
So innovation is not differentiation in my opinion. Innovation is risky in the market of this era, and differentiation is often insurance.
666
Excellent