Good hardware and round appearance will give you a shocking audio-visual experience, improve the happiness of life and define the new life of urban youth.
A little suggestion, each part of the research gives a little summary, similar to how the previous research guides you to complete the design (appearance, cmf, usage habits, crowd positioning, etc.), how do you define your design according to your research, improve the existing products, etc., otherwise, I feel that the previous research has little to do with your design, and I will lose the significance of the research.
To be honest, should we reduce something? The plug is too slow, but it ignores the primary and secondary, at least the combination of function and appearance is clean.
Typesetting does not comment. product itself. The first shape has too many identical levels of detail, protruding big eyes, protruding transparency, protruding texture, etc. Then the details are plated and the heat dissipation holes are too trivial. Second, CMF is also very messy and has many colors. Third, the tone (style) of the product is not clear, the characteristics are simple and complex, Q and business are simple, and the combination of big eyes and large-scale does not match. Fourth, it is good to deal with the middle CMF part if it is simple (know more about this large-scale reference and know what product you refer to). If it is protruding big eyes or fusion and function set. Wait... It's purely a bit uncomfortable, so I comment on
It's not that you understand it wrong. I carefully read your research and found that the product in the ninth picture is incorrectly marked. this is nut p3s, not polar rice p3s, polar rice does not have p3s
Research is only your work process... as a result, the audience's eyes will give the answer.
A little suggestion, each part of the research gives a little summary, similar to how the previous research guides you to complete the design (appearance, cmf, usage habits, crowd positioning, etc.), how do you define your design according to your research, improve the existing products, etc., otherwise, I feel that the previous research has little to do with your design, and I will lose the significance of the research.
To be honest, should we reduce something? The plug is too slow, but it ignores the primary and secondary, at least the combination of function and appearance is clean.
good
Look good!
Niubi Cras
Wonderful! Fly!
Not bad, not bad
Personality
This does not seem to be extremely rice, I use a nut projector.
Not bad
Good outside, good alternative
Very design