On December 15, 2021, I was really surprised to read this article and the following comments today. The three views of some people in the comment area are really chilling,
First: Designers have been designing new products without stopping.
Second: Is it wrong to be stolen by human traffickers to seek and defend their rights? Your suggestion is to let him have one. Can people with this kind of values understand what is common affection?
Third: For designers or manufacturers, what is development and what is prosperity? Don't let the original fire go out.
After reading the full text for three times, I have a lot of experience in actual combat rights protection. I can see that the author is not afraid of problems and is willing to analyze experience and failures. I am very moved. Looking down at the comment area, there are a lot of good bars and keyboard players. People share their experiences. You can not read them, but also leave a special message saying that they are disgusted with them. The somebody else is plagiarized, you don't go to crusade against the shanzhai, you run over and say that the designer runs faster, see what you have not experienced, you can still talk loudly, say that, just force blindly.
I didn't expect to let everyone discuss in the comment area and reply in a unified way:
1. Thank you for your support and attention, thank you for your concern,
2. Many new products have been sold in the market, and several award-winning B- side projects have also been launched. Independent brand products, the team is developing new products.
3. In the process of safeguarding rights, we have special lawyers and I will follow up.
4. Where the products are not good, they have been adjusted many times. Thank you for your suggestions,
5. I will deal with rights protection matters by myself. I will be responsible for my products from beginning to end and will not involve our team.
There is also battery technology and so on. If a certain design day proudly said that the whole process of a certain product is genuine software and does not infringe any intellectual property rights in the world, all relevant technologies in the world are welcome to be verified, and infringement directly loses money such as 500,000. At that time, you can call the cottage worthless. Without this pride, we must reflect on whether we are a participant in the copycat and a thorough defender of intellectual property rights. Be restrained.
Also, if you make products, especially consumer products, involving mature industries, the appearance may not be fake, but some technologies of the products will inevitably make use of the existing patented technologies. If you inquire about the validity period of patents around the world for each product and 100% original, you will not be able to make the product cycle will increase n times. Even for your lamp, if you inquire about the global patent of LED, you find that many domestic LED lamp beads have patent problems. If you have no defendant, it does not mean that there is no infringement.
The first time I saw you crusade against the shanzhai, I felt very touched, very sympathetic, and I hated them as much as you did. The second time, the third time, the n th time, I saw you still saying this here....... There will inevitably be a trace of disgust.......
The big brother shared his story for the inexperienced little white. They saw that they had at least done the crackdown and rights protection. They did their best to tell us their experience and were willing to share it. I think you are free, leaving messages everywhere to spray other designers.
I am a programmer at work who can't design but appreciates design. I use software and threshold to protect the design. Welcome to chat and cooperate in spare time. wechat:#china#mcu#, remove#
Music light belt (brand# G#o#v#e#e#, remove#), go to Amazon to find out, personally designed light efficiency algorithm, the company's derivatives have sold more than a billion, although there are plagiarists, the effect is slag, we have not applied for a patent. It is recommended to join hands with Cheng Xuyuan to protect the program by using an encryption chip and setting a threshold to prevent the other party from plagiarizing easily. Or, at least although the other party can plagiarize, but the true and false, plagiarize the cost is extremely high, you have to hire a professional NB programmer, when it is done, you have developed the next generation.
He doesn't have a chip in this lamp, how to encrypt it? is to switch to control the electricity, and then magnetic suction to control the two balls. it was copied so harshly because the technical threshold is relatively low, fake is really too difficult to solve, can only control extinction
In fact, this is the case. We should learn more about how the fake boss deals with the fake products. We should make the product technology the simplest, produce in large quantities in an instant, and occupy the market in an instant. When the fake starts to plagiarize, the cost of the products has been reduced to a very low level. We should stop the production of the products, put them on the shelves of the second generation, and authorize the OEM to make fake products.
Learn to compromise with craftsmanship. Original products must have a time difference so that others can't keep up with your rhythm. The market must count every minute. When you develop products, you are not a designer, but it hurts. You can only live by killing others. Or, like Dyson, make a product that no one else can surpass.
When you say these things to a poor designer, don't you stand and talk without pain? How can you open a large number of models without money? Are you tough with capital? Are you just past capital? Or are you looking for capital cooperation and falling into the trap of capital just like the author.
On December 15, 2021, I was really surprised to read this article and the following comments today. The three views of some people in the comment area are really chilling,
First: Designers have been designing new products without stopping.
Second: Is it wrong to be stolen by human traffickers to seek and defend their rights? Your suggestion is to let him have one. Can people with this kind of values understand what is common affection?
Third: For designers or manufacturers, what is development and what is prosperity? Don't let the original fire go out.
It's not easy
Mr. Li, it's really great. I look forward to more new products!
GOOD!
After reading the full text for three times, I have a lot of experience in actual combat rights protection. I can see that the author is not afraid of problems and is willing to analyze experience and failures. I am very moved. Looking down at the comment area, there are a lot of good bars and keyboard players. People share their experiences. You can not read them, but also leave a special message saying that they are disgusted with them. The somebody else is plagiarized, you don't go to crusade against the shanzhai, you run over and say that the designer runs faster, see what you have not experienced, you can still talk loudly, say that, just force blindly.
I didn't expect to let everyone discuss in the comment area and reply in a unified way:
1. Thank you for your support and attention, thank you for your concern,
2. Many new products have been sold in the market, and several award-winning B- side projects have also been launched. Independent brand products, the team is developing new products.
3. In the process of safeguarding rights, we have special lawyers and I will follow up.
4. Where the products are not good, they have been adjusted many times. Thank you for your suggestions,
5. I will deal with rights protection matters by myself. I will be responsible for my products from beginning to end and will not involve our team.
There is also battery technology and so on. If a certain design day proudly said that the whole process of a certain product is genuine software and does not infringe any intellectual property rights in the world, all relevant technologies in the world are welcome to be verified, and infringement directly loses money such as 500,000. At that time, you can call the cottage worthless. Without this pride, we must reflect on whether we are a participant in the copycat and a thorough defender of intellectual property rights. Be restrained.
Also, if you make products, especially consumer products, involving mature industries, the appearance may not be fake, but some technologies of the products will inevitably make use of the existing patented technologies. If you inquire about the validity period of patents around the world for each product and 100% original, you will not be able to make the product cycle will increase n times. Even for your lamp, if you inquire about the global patent of LED, you find that many domestic LED lamp beads have patent problems. If you have no defendant, it does not mean that there is no infringement.
After the crusade, I have been disgusted with it for a long time. People have updated
We have applied for copyright protection and patents for our works in the university, but they are only some excellent works.
Why don't you share the location of the store downstairs? I want to go to an interview if I fail to start a business!
The first time I saw you crusade against the shanzhai, I felt very touched, very sympathetic, and I hated them as much as you did. The second time, the third time, the n th time, I saw you still saying this here....... There will inevitably be a trace of disgust.......
I am a programmer at work who can't design but appreciates design. I use software and threshold to protect the design. Welcome to chat and cooperate in spare time. wechat:#china#mcu#, remove#
Music light belt (brand# G#o#v#e#e#, remove#), go to Amazon to find out, personally designed light efficiency algorithm, the company's derivatives have sold more than a billion, although there are plagiarists, the effect is slag, we have not applied for a patent. It is recommended to join hands with Cheng Xuyuan to protect the program by using an encryption chip and setting a threshold to prevent the other party from plagiarizing easily. Or, at least although the other party can plagiarize, but the true and false, plagiarize the cost is extremely high, you have to hire a professional NB programmer, when it is done, you have developed the next generation.
In fact, this is the case. We should learn more about how the fake boss deals with the fake products. We should make the product technology the simplest, produce in large quantities in an instant, and occupy the market in an instant. When the fake starts to plagiarize, the cost of the products has been reduced to a very low level. We should stop the production of the products, put them on the shelves of the second generation, and authorize the OEM to make fake products.