Is there a link? Go and have a look.

https://www.bilibili.com/video/av550193329/

I just looked at it. It is true that the author's problem is still in the seat. It should be much better to be at least flush with the rear wheel, at least not so strange.

https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1k7411M79U/?spm_id_from=333.999.0.0&vd_source=919484f79092024ea2f0b612ffe93a65,工匠派那个的转向机制不合理,应该看这个外国小哥的这个案例,可以理解成是他的油改电版本 。

I have looked at it. In several videos, all the modified cars still keep the seat's center of gravity above the rear wheel or between the front and rear wheels and the rear wheels, not directly behind the rear wheel. This is also a big reason that feels strange. The author can change it, because the seat is behind the rear wheel and the center of gravity will be unstable.

I also know that the author put the seat behind the rear wheel because it was out of harmony with the basket in front, so it was time to adjust the arc surface of the back of the motorcycle. It was too arc, so the seat could only look better after the rear wheel. Do you think my analysis is reasonable

We have different starting points for considering problems in design.

In fact, the joke is a joke. Let's go back to the question and ask the following questions: 1. Regardless of the problem of the use scene, just looking at the product itself, it feels that it is not ergonomic. The front and rear wheels are too small and the body is too large. The radian gives people a sense of awkwardness. Will there be so many seats behind the rear wheels that the whole car will be turned over directly from the front by the weight of the person? How to put your legs after a person sits on it is a bit unimaginable. 2. For the problem of using the scene, the author said that compared with ordinary electric vehicles, there is no pressure in parking, but is there really no pressure in parking? Although the lateral length of the car is indeed shortened, the longitudinal width gives people a visual feeling of widening. I feel that the problem of no pressure in parking is not fundamentally solved. For the problem of improving the safety compared with standing scooters, please refer to the upturn problem I first raised, with regard to effectively alleviating the potential safety hazard of random parking and assembly of urban electric vehicles, I feel that the products designed by the author are not much linked to this problem, at least I do not feel that the potential safety hazard of random parking or assembly has been solved.

But the reason why I think it's cute is that it's really like a little electric donkey riding around in Moore Manor, so it feels cute, but it also illustrates a problem: the first feeling of the author's product is not It's like a ride for people, it's more like a ride for cartoon characters. The big reason is the proportion.

This product focuses on the counterweight ratio of processing technology and materials, which can reach a 6:4 counterweight ratio of front and rear and can bear 200kg. The weight of the 21700 battery pack contained in the middle part accounts for most of the weight and the counterweight of the driving wheels. The appearance needs to be bright at the moment instead of the same. First of all, this product is a subdivision of electric mopeds. After all, there are a few people who consume this product, the original intention of marketing this product is to publicize, not to take volume. With the help of existing technology, I need to make new categories. This is what I need to do. If the design is really just designing, it is too one-sided. Your above comments are right. The design idea is perfect, but it may need to be combined with business.

So this product has landed, right

What is needed is this kind of reaction effect. After all, designers are a minority in the crowd, and it is impossible to have the same path to think about problems.

There is no conflict between redesigning and maintaining the tradition. I just want to make a suggestion. There is a reason why most electric mopeds are basically the same in size. It is precisely because they are to be used by users and convenient for users. Its appearance and structure have basically been finalized. It is basically the same. When it comes to combining business, you have to sell it before it is called business, it is not to say that it is called innovation contrary to most products now, but to make reasonable differentiation on the basis of existing products, provided that it is reasonable.

Need your investment

We may not understand the same thing, but I very much support your statement.

All right, I also answered according to your answer, then I wish you success.

You can find the big brother to land, come on