TOY-SOAP Toy Soap

HZL

China · Other Industries

TOY-SOAP Toy Soap

TOY-SOAP provides a plan for children not to wash their hands, while making them like to wash their hands.

During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) epidemic, hand washing is one of the best ways to protect yourself and your family from getting sick. However, we found that children are unwilling to wash their hands. TOY-SOAP is a group of soaps designed for children to solve this challenge. We use colorful colors, smells, and frequent hand washing to get the interactive behavior settings of toys to motivate children and make them like to wash their hands. At the same time, a ring is installed for the soap to make the child better grasp, and also make its packaging more brilliant in similar products. The random design of the products in the packaging enriches the child's surprise experience when buying.

soap，epidemic situation，children，experience，

Handwashing is only a behavior required by parents in children's cognition. They do not know enough about the characteristics, transmission route and importance of hand washing of the new coronavirus. We design the whole behavior of hand washing. We put toys into soap and attract children through colorful colors and aroma. Children's habitual cognition of soap will know that they can get toys inside by washing hands frequently. Establish a reward mechanism to change children's psychological understanding of the behavior of hand washing and eliminate resistance. Colorful colors will attract children's closeness, and different colors will produce different fragrances, eliminating children's resistance to hand washing in vision, smell and psychology.

TOY-SOAP is a group of soaps designed for children. Through colorful colors, smells, and frequent hand washing to obtain the interactive behavior settings of toys, it motivates children and makes them like to wash their hands.
TOY-SOAP is a group of soaps designed for small children to motivate and get children to enjoy washing their hands through colorful, scented, interactive behavioral settings of washing hands regularly to get toys.

Different colors will produce different aromas
Different colors produce different aromas

The ring can be easily hung on the hook.
Round ring can be easily hung on the hook

At the same time, we noticed that children's hands are sometimes difficult to grasp. We installed a ring for soap, which makes soap better grip. The exposed ring handle also makes its packaging especially brilliant in similar products.
At the same time, we noticed that children's hands sometimes have difficulty gripping the soap, we installed a ring for the soap, which makes the soap better to grip, in addition to the exposed ring handle also makes its packaging in a similar product also stands out.

At the purchasing end of soap, the packaging adopts random design. The randomness of toys in soap enhances the user's psychological experience at the time of purchase, making the whole process of hand washing more interesting and making children feel like a game.
Soap in the purchase end, the packaging uses a random design, the randomness of the toys in the soap enhances the sense of user psychological experience at the time of purchase, making the whole hand-washing session more interesting, so that the child feels like a game.

218 330

GS · DESIGN 2022-01-17

Very good design, solve many problems

A 2022-01-05

Look good!! But will children take out the toys inside and wash them all the time

清浅 2024-11-15

Will, ha ha ha ha

我也说一句

Lucien 2021-08-12

I like it

HZL作者 2021-08-13

Thank you

句号 2021-07-19

Retrospective design?

HZL作者 2021-08-04

No.

BORE 2021-07-16

In fact, the author should prompt the source of creativity. In fact, as far as the product is concerned, the author's content is richer and the visual interaction is more attractive. This should be the problem he wants to solve.

Regardless of the creative similarities, this design is still very good.

无 2021-07-14

Rendering invincible

HZL作者 2021-07-14

KOKUU 2021-07-13

The author should pay a lot of attention to nendo and Mr. Naoto Fukasawa

HZL作者 2021-07-13

As for idols, they have a thorough analysis of their works.

sick! 2021-07-10

Render tql! This is to learn ms!

HZL作者 2021-07-11

Learn ha ha ha ha

Show_CYL 2021-07-10

It's okay to recommend and praise yourself

HZL 作者 2021-07-09

I announce the process I designed for everyone to judge.
What I am solving is the psychological problems of children washing their hands in the context of the epidemic.
The stimulation of color to visual senses will arouse children's curiosity. Therefore, color is used in color, and aroma will bring comfort to people. Therefore, I design to produce different smells in different colors. The randomness of this color smell can also satisfy children's curiosity and cultivate children's cognition through color. I analyze what it means for children to wash their hands. I define it as an act of parents ordering and wasting time. This is a zero-sum game model. Parents get personal hygiene protection for their children to wash their hands, and the children lose time and let the water moisten their hands (psychologically certainly uncomfortable). I analyze the child's psychological state and let the child get something. The color and smell just make the child not hate it. Put the toy that the child likes into it. As long as you wash your hands frequently, you can get the toy. Design a reward mechanism to make the whole model a positive-sum model. Because what a toy is is not important in the whole system, I did not delve into the form of the toy. In addition, through unconscious design thinking, what problems children will encounter during soap use, I found that children's fingers cannot hold the entire soap, and they are likely to slip. I use this behavior as the structure of the product itself through a ring of fixed soap, which can also be said to be the combination of packaging and the product. Next is the idea of the packaging surface, because the commonality of toys, colors and smells is random. I plan to strengthen it under the packaging and use the current popular blind box culture.
As for the previous text, what I saw in the three comment areas is the https://new.qq.com/omn/20210503/20210503A09EHD00.html,因为使用交互模型是一样的 of Africa.
https://www.zcool.com.cn/work/ZMjY4OTEwMTI=.html这个我理解是多从环保和可供性出发,并且里边的玩具是固定的企鹅和北极熊,用完留下来也是从可持续环保的角度,在此之前我也没有详细看过相关的文本

周晟 2021-07-24

In fact, it is very simple, it is a soap with geixiaohaisy reward mechanism.

In fact, it is very simple. It is a soap with a reward mechanism for children. There are many designs of this reward mechanism. It rewards taking medicine.Such amount

But the rendering is really good

Modeling, soap design is good.

And the toys inside

蹦der 2021-07-09

Will it lead to accidental eating

@西西柚子 2021-12-20

Children who can wash their hands independently should have a preliminary understanding of daily life. The author's audience also analyzed that it is for children around 7 years old.

勤勉的设计 2021-07-09

First of all, this idea was first designed by a design company in Shanghai and won the Red Dot Design Award. This work of yours coincides with that 95%, unless you say that you also designed it. Baidu can be found easily. If you haven't seen it, I can only say that you haven't done a good job of checking the weight before the design. Secondly, which of the four models in the soap is designed by yourself? Two of them are classic children's chair designs. Is that how you designed them? What are you using? It is suggested that you do all the designs when you do them, and don't put them together.

心要野 2021-07-09

I don't think you need to stand on the moral high ground and accuse others, creative crash or form crash doesn't mean plagiarism, shouldn't there be a good idea to express? And for the soap inside the model is publicly used on the material site, and the whole design is actually based on a simple service design.

I personally suggest that before expressing your own doubts, please do a good job of research on the whole process of this design, instead of making such irresponsible remarks here. If you think there is a problem, you can discuss it with the author first, instead of directly working on the premise that nothing is clear. If you say so, there will be many similar works in the selection of international awards every year, are they all plagiarism? Of course, if you think you are more authoritative than the international judges, I won't say it.

I haven't seen the creativity, some please throw links. This design starts from solving a problem and does not pay attention to the creativity itself. The design is a psychological process of hand washing behavior and a design project starting from problem solving. I use vision, smell and behavior model as an integrated solution, which is essentially different from creative works. Furthermore, the toys inside have been weakened. It is only used as a conceptual expression to propose a solution. I can solve this problem even if I choose at will in Chaoshan Toy City.

You solve the problem, so do others. https://www.zcool.com.cn/work/ZMjY4OTEwMTI=.html

This is the design you understand? The product designed by others, and then the model is used casually, right? Isn't this smelly shameless? What else do you want

橙诚🍊 2021-07-09

There are quite a few links...

http://shijue.me/community/photo-details/4b76ed38a36944ffbf2d5d5038ad5a76_d

https://new.qq.com/omn/20210503/20210503A09EHD00.html

https://sunsoapshop.com/products/frog-kids-critter-soap?variant=32081876484211

沈。文静 2021-07-09

I think you're a little der

Are you too fake

嗷呜 2021-07-10

No, maybe you haven't seen that group of works, because this work can no longer be said to be similar, it can be said that it is really 95 like. Usually people learn from other people's works are A B or A B C, which can be said to be A A, because there is not much change from the original, so they feel that they are too similar to other works.

X 2021-08-03

This can be brushed to boss Chen

HUI 2022-04-25

Whether the plagiarism author knows well, no matter how good the modeling rendering is, the preliminary research did not do well and repeated 95% with others is also a failed design. No matter how much explanation it is, it seems grandiose.